Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of the retrospective or prospective application of amended provisions of Section 50C regarding Capital Gain computation. Citing a case precedent, it was held that the proviso to Section 50C(1) should be considered retrospective from its inception. Consequently, the amendment to Section 50C applies retrospectively, requiring the recomputation of capital gains based on stamp duty value at the agreement date. The decision favored the taxpayer, rejecting the revenue's stance.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of the retrospective or prospective application of amended provisions of Section 50C regarding Capital Gain computation. Citing a case precedent, it was held that the proviso to Section 50C(1) should be considered retrospective from its inception. Consequently, the amendment to Section 50C applies retrospectively, requiring the recomputation of capital gains based on stamp duty value at the agreement date. The decision favored the taxpayer, rejecting the revenue's stance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
