Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the validity of the National Faceless Assessment Centre's notice u/s 143(2) for the assessee. Regarding tax rates for domestic companies and cooperative banks u/s 90, the Tribunal referred to past decisions and dismissed the appeal. Data processing fees paid by the Indian branch to the Singapore branch were deemed non-taxable. Interest payments by Indian branches to the head office were analyzed u/s 12 and 7 of the India-France DTAA, concluding that interest income of the head office is not taxable under the DTAA. An addition under profit and gain from business was remanded for further assessment. The Tribunal's decisions were based on legal interpretations and past precedents, leading to the dismissal or allowance of various grounds of appeal.
The Appellate Tribunal upheld the validity of the National Faceless Assessment Centre's notice u/s 143(2) for the assessee. Regarding tax rates for domestic companies and cooperative banks u/s 90, the Tribunal referred to past decisions and dismissed the appeal. Data processing fees paid by the Indian branch to the Singapore branch were deemed non-taxable. Interest payments by Indian branches to the head office were analyzed u/s 12 and 7 of the India-France DTAA, concluding that interest income of the head office is not taxable under the DTAA. An addition under profit and gain from business was remanded for further assessment. The Tribunal's decisions were based on legal interpretations and past precedents, leading to the dismissal or allowance of various grounds of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.