Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Page of 4897
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 97923 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on the classification of Cheeslings under Tariff Item 21069099 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue of availing exemption under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. was settled in a previous case involving the same appellant. Despite Cheeslings not being fried, their sale as "Namkeen" qualified for the exemption. The Tribunal found no merit in the confirmed demands on the appellant and allowed the appeal in their favor.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on the classification of Cheeslings under Tariff Item 21069099 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue of availing exemption under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. was settled in a previous case involving the same appellant. Despite Cheeslings not being fried, their sale as "Namkeen" qualified for the exemption. The Tribunal found no merit in the confirmed demands on the appellant and allowed the appeal in their favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4897 
