Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on the classification of Cheeslings under Tariff Item 21069099 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue of availing exemption under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. was settled in a previous case involving the same appellant. Despite Cheeslings not being fried, their sale as "Namkeen" qualified for the exemption. The Tribunal found no merit in the confirmed demands on the appellant and allowed the appeal in their favor.
CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, ruled on the classification of Cheeslings under Tariff Item 21069099 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The issue of availing exemption under Notification No. 3/2006-C.E. was settled in a previous case involving the same appellant. Despite Cheeslings not being fried, their sale as "Namkeen" qualified for the exemption. The Tribunal found no merit in the confirmed demands on the appellant and allowed the appeal in their favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
