Pre-amendment reassessment limitation bars late notices under the preserved regime, invalidating consequential reassessment for affected earlier asses...
Cash-sales explanations for bank deposits require documentary reconciliation; reassessment notice survived where effective response time was available...
Functional comparability in transfer pricing prevents ad hoc arm's length adjustments where functions, assets, risks and reliable comparables are unes...
Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
The High Court addressed the issue of violation of natural...
Argument that respondent failed to provide hearing opportunity due to portal issues rejected. Petitioner's tax credit shortfall upheld. Petition dismissed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court addressed the issue of violation of natural justice due to the respondent's failure to provide a personal hearing opportunity. The petitioner faced difficulties with the online portal, resulting in the inability to upload eligible input tax credit. The court noted a shortfall in maintaining books of account for claiming input tax credit. The respondent considered relevant sections of the CGST Act and upheld the obligation to pay interest on the total tax liability. Referring to a previous judgment, the court dismissed the petitioner's contentions, ruling in favor of the respondent. The petition was ultimately dismissed.
The High Court addressed the issue of violation of natural justice due to the respondent's failure to provide a personal hearing opportunity. The petitioner faced difficulties with the online portal, resulting in the inability to upload eligible input tax credit. The court noted a shortfall in maintaining books of account for claiming input tax credit. The respondent considered relevant sections of the CGST Act and upheld the obligation to pay interest on the total tax liability. Referring to a previous judgment, the court dismissed the petitioner's contentions, ruling in favor of the respondent. The petition was ultimately dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.