Income-tax prosecution fails when appellate remand removes its factual foundation; directors require company arraignment for vicarious criminal liabil...
Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition u/s 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, in light of the availability of statutory remedy. Citing the principle of natural justice, the Court referred to a Supreme Court decision emphasizing the discretion of the High Court not to entertain a writ petition when an effective alternate remedy exists. Since the petitioner acknowledged the right to challenge orders through appeal, the High Court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue appeal as per statute. The Court clarified that it did not assess the merits of the case, dismissing the petition solely based on the availability of statutory remedy.
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition u/s 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, in light of the availability of statutory remedy. Citing the principle of natural justice, the Court referred to a Supreme Court decision emphasizing the discretion of the High Court not to entertain a writ petition when an effective alternate remedy exists. Since the petitioner acknowledged the right to challenge orders through appeal, the High Court dismissed the petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue appeal as per statute. The Court clarified that it did not assess the merits of the case, dismissing the petition solely based on the availability of statutory remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
