Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 97862 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC addressed alleged excess input tax credit claim u/s 73 SGST/CGST Act, 2017. No SCN issued, only summary, violating Section 73 and Rule 142. Violation of natural justice. Notice issued, returnable in 4 weeks. Counsels for respondents accepted notice. Waiver of Notices due to representation. Extra copies of petition to be served within 1 week. Next hearing on 24.06.2024. Demand order dated 28.04.2024 stayed till next date.
HC addressed alleged excess input tax credit claim u/s 73 SGST/CGST Act, 2017. No SCN issued, only summary, violating Section 73 and Rule 142. Violation of natural justice. Notice issued, returnable in 4 weeks. Counsels for respondents accepted notice. Waiver of Notices due to representation. Extra copies of petition to be served within 1 week. Next hearing on 24.06.2024. Demand order dated 28.04.2024 stayed till next date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.