Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC addressed alleged excess input tax credit claim u/s 73 SGST/CGST Act, 2017. No SCN issued, only summary, violating Section 73 and Rule 142. Violation of natural justice. Notice issued, returnable in 4 weeks. Counsels for respondents accepted notice. Waiver of Notices due to representation. Extra copies of petition to be served within 1 week. Next hearing on 24.06.2024. Demand order dated 28.04.2024 stayed till next date.
HC addressed alleged excess input tax credit claim u/s 73 SGST/CGST Act, 2017. No SCN issued, only summary, violating Section 73 and Rule 142. Violation of natural justice. Notice issued, returnable in 4 weeks. Counsels for respondents accepted notice. Waiver of Notices due to representation. Extra copies of petition to be served within 1 week. Next hearing on 24.06.2024. Demand order dated 28.04.2024 stayed till next date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.