Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved the clearance of hot dipped galvanized steel coils below the minimum import price set by DGFT. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the minimum import price notification u/s 3 of the FTDR Act. The appellant's argument that the notification was not applicable was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized that Customs must adhere to DGFT notifications. Citing a similar case, the Tribunal justified the imposition of a redemption fine. However, considering the unique circumstances, the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 8,00,000. Appeal partially allowed.
The case involved the clearance of hot dipped galvanized steel coils below the minimum import price set by DGFT. The Tribunal upheld the validity of the minimum import price notification u/s 3 of the FTDR Act. The appellant's argument that the notification was not applicable was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized that Customs must adhere to DGFT notifications. Citing a similar case, the Tribunal justified the imposition of a redemption fine. However, considering the unique circumstances, the redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 8,00,000. Appeal partially allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
