Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The Appellate Tribunal considered the conversion of free Shipping Bills into drawback Shipping Bills u/s 149 of Customs Act. It clarified that goods funded by KOICA for export to aid Nepal post-earthquake fall under specific categories of Notification 208/1977-Cus. The Adjudicating Authority erred in categorizing the goods under a different provision that required payment in Indian currency, which was not the case here. The Tribunal directed the Authority to modify the Shipping Bills to enable the Appellants to claim drawbacks. Appeal allowed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the conversion of free Shipping Bills into drawback Shipping Bills u/s 149 of Customs Act. It clarified that goods funded by KOICA for export to aid Nepal post-earthquake fall under specific categories of Notification 208/1977-Cus. The Adjudicating Authority erred in categorizing the goods under a different provision that required payment in Indian currency, which was not the case here. The Tribunal directed the Authority to modify the Shipping Bills to enable the Appellants to claim drawbacks. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.