Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
In a case before ITAT Delhi, the issue was whether expenses incurred on Employee Stock Option (ESOP) scheme are allowable u/s 37(1). The AO disallowed the expenses, deeming them as notional and contingent. However, the CIT(A) allowed the expenditure. The assessee, a private limited company in real estate consultancy, argued that ESOP expenses were actually incurred. Citing precedents like M/S. BIOCON LTD. and LEMON TREE HOTELS LTD., the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that ESOP expenses are allowable. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
In a case before ITAT Delhi, the issue was whether expenses incurred on Employee Stock Option (ESOP) scheme are allowable u/s 37(1). The AO disallowed the expenses, deeming them as notional and contingent. However, the CIT(A) allowed the expenditure. The assessee, a private limited company in real estate consultancy, argued that ESOP expenses were actually incurred. Citing precedents like M/S. BIOCON LTD. and LEMON TREE HOTELS LTD., the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that ESOP expenses are allowable. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4872 
