Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The Delhi High Court allowed the application regarding money laundering and provisional attachment of property. The court ordered the substitution of the attached property, a land worth Rs. 4,68,60,710/-, with a bank guarantee of equivalent amount to be provided by the petitioner within 15 days. The bank guarantee will have a lien in favor of the respondent and will be kept active through periodic renewals until the trial concludes. If the respondents succeed, they can encash the bank guarantee. The petitioner must submit an affidavit undertaking not to create any interest in the bank guarantee for any other party. This decision aligns with Supreme Court precedents allowing substitution of attached property with financial instruments.
The Delhi High Court allowed the application regarding money laundering and provisional attachment of property. The court ordered the substitution of the attached property, a land worth Rs. 4,68,60,710/-, with a bank guarantee of equivalent amount to be provided by the petitioner within 15 days. The bank guarantee will have a lien in favor of the respondent and will be kept active through periodic renewals until the trial concludes. If the respondents succeed, they can encash the bank guarantee. The petitioner must submit an affidavit undertaking not to create any interest in the bank guarantee for any other party. This decision aligns with Supreme Court precedents allowing substitution of attached property with financial instruments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
