COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court allowed the application regarding money laundering and provisional attachment of property. The court ordered the substitution of the attached property, a land worth Rs. 4,68,60,710/-, with a bank guarantee of equivalent amount to be provided by the petitioner within 15 days. The bank guarantee will have a lien in favor of the respondent and will be kept active through periodic renewals until the trial concludes. If the respondents succeed, they can encash the bank guarantee. The petitioner must submit an affidavit undertaking not to create any interest in the bank guarantee for any other party. This decision aligns with Supreme Court precedents allowing substitution of attached property with financial instruments.
The Delhi High Court allowed the application regarding money laundering and provisional attachment of property. The court ordered the substitution of the attached property, a land worth Rs. 4,68,60,710/-, with a bank guarantee of equivalent amount to be provided by the petitioner within 15 days. The bank guarantee will have a lien in favor of the respondent and will be kept active through periodic renewals until the trial concludes. If the respondents succeed, they can encash the bank guarantee. The petitioner must submit an affidavit undertaking not to create any interest in the bank guarantee for any other party. This decision aligns with Supreme Court precedents allowing substitution of attached property with financial instruments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
