Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court addressed the issue of deduction u/s 11(1) concerning accumulation of 15% of deemed income. The court noted that Explanation 2, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, does not apply to the case at hand (AY 2009-10). The donations made by the respondent were not affected by Explanation 2 as they were not directed to specific institutions for corpus formation. The court explained that Section 11(2) allows for accumulation of income for charitable purposes. The donations made to other charitable institutions were not subject to adverse consequences u/s 11(3) as they were reversed within a short period. The court distinguished a previous case concerning Section 80T deductions, emphasizing the unique requirements of Section 11 for charitable institutions. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the appellant's arguments.
The Delhi High Court addressed the issue of deduction u/s 11(1) concerning accumulation of 15% of deemed income. The court noted that Explanation 2, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, does not apply to the case at hand (AY 2009-10). The donations made by the respondent were not affected by Explanation 2 as they were not directed to specific institutions for corpus formation. The court explained that Section 11(2) allows for accumulation of income for charitable purposes. The donations made to other charitable institutions were not subject to adverse consequences u/s 11(3) as they were reversed within a short period. The court distinguished a previous case concerning Section 80T deductions, emphasizing the unique requirements of Section 11 for charitable institutions. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the appellant's arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
