Mandatory textile export qualifiers distinguish flame-retardant fabrics from other listed fabrics for automated identification under the textiles ince...
Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Page of 4884
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 97661 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Delhi High Court addressed the issue of deduction u/s 11(1) concerning accumulation of 15% of deemed income. The court noted that Explanation 2, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, does not apply to the case at hand (AY 2009-10). The donations made by the respondent were not affected by Explanation 2 as they were not directed to specific institutions for corpus formation. The court explained that Section 11(2) allows for accumulation of income for charitable purposes. The donations made to other charitable institutions were not subject to adverse consequences u/s 11(3) as they were reversed within a short period. The court distinguished a previous case concerning Section 80T deductions, emphasizing the unique requirements of Section 11 for charitable institutions. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the appellant's arguments.
The Delhi High Court addressed the issue of deduction u/s 11(1) concerning accumulation of 15% of deemed income. The court noted that Explanation 2, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, does not apply to the case at hand (AY 2009-10). The donations made by the respondent were not affected by Explanation 2 as they were not directed to specific institutions for corpus formation. The court explained that Section 11(2) allows for accumulation of income for charitable purposes. The donations made to other charitable institutions were not subject to adverse consequences u/s 11(3) as they were reversed within a short period. The court distinguished a previous case concerning Section 80T deductions, emphasizing the unique requirements of Section 11 for charitable institutions. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, rejecting the appellant's arguments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4884 
