Judicial discipline requires consistent reassessment treatment where identical facts were decided for the same taxpayer in the preceding assessment ye...
Agreement-date stamp valuation requires the same registered property, fixed consideration, and qualifying payment; an unrelated prior booking cannot a...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case concerns the liability of an exporter to pay GST on export freight as CGST & SGST or IGST. The ruling states that post the sunset clause on ocean/air freight, such activities became taxable under GST from 1.10.2022. The tax liability depends on the 'place of supply,' which, in this case, is 'outside India,' making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST. If the service provider, the shipping line, has an office in Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, the liability shifts to CGST/SGST for intra-state supply. The exporter is not liable for GST as it receives the service as input for its CIF basis exports. The ruling does not address the liability of the shipping line for GST.
The case concerns the liability of an exporter to pay GST on export freight as CGST & SGST or IGST. The ruling states that post the sunset clause on ocean/air freight, such activities became taxable under GST from 1.10.2022. The tax liability depends on the 'place of supply,' which, in this case, is 'outside India,' making it an inter-state supply subject to IGST. If the service provider, the shipping line, has an office in Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, the liability shifts to CGST/SGST for intra-state supply. The exporter is not liable for GST as it receives the service as input for its CIF basis exports. The ruling does not address the liability of the shipping line for GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.