Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
The Advance Ruling Authority in Tamil Nadu addressed the liability of an exporter (M/s. DCW Ltd.) under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) to pay GST on export freight on Free on Board (FOB) basis. The exporter was found not liable for GST on RCM basis as they are not involved in arranging export freight. The shipping line accepting goods from the exporter was not required to pay GST on RCM basis as they were not the applicant and not involved in the transaction. The question of GST liability on export freight and whether it constitutes an inter-state supply subject to IGST was deemed irrelevant as it did not pertain to the exporter. The determination of taxable value in the absence of known freight value was not addressed due to the preceding conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
