Supervisory permanent establishment requires project-wise duration and qualifying construction nexus; offshore supplies and salary reimbursements rema...
Transfer-pricing comparability permits fresh objections and filters where software service comparables are functionally unsuitable for arm's-length pr...
Territorial rendering requirement excludes China-based management and consultancy services from fees for technical services under the India-China DTAA...
CESTAT New Delhi held that an aircraft used for transporting persons for remuneration falls under public transport, not private use. Referring to M/s.V.R.L. Logistics, it determined the aircraft's usage as non-scheduled (Passenger) service, complying with Condition No.104 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. The Tribunal upheld the decision, dismissing appeals as no violation occurred, resolving issues of confiscation, interest, and penalty. The definition of 'Air Transport Service' and 'Scheduled Air Transport Service' from Aircraft Rules guided the classification, emphasizing the distinction between private and public transport aircraft.
CESTAT New Delhi held that an aircraft used for transporting persons for remuneration falls under public transport, not private use. Referring to M/s.V.R.L. Logistics, it determined the aircraft's usage as non-scheduled (Passenger) service, complying with Condition No.104 of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. The Tribunal upheld the decision, dismissing appeals as no violation occurred, resolving issues of confiscation, interest, and penalty. The definition of 'Air Transport Service' and 'Scheduled Air Transport Service' from Aircraft Rules guided the classification, emphasizing the distinction between private and public transport aircraft.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
