Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. The court found that the petitioner did not file a reply to the show cause notice, violating natural justice principles. The petitioner's claim of filing a reply was not substantiated with evidence. The court criticized the petitioner for not approaching the court with clean hands and abusing the process. The petition was dismissed with costs due to the petitioner's failure to comply and wasting court time.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration. The court found that the petitioner did not file a reply to the show cause notice, violating natural justice principles. The petitioner's claim of filing a reply was not substantiated with evidence. The court criticized the petitioner for not approaching the court with clean hands and abusing the process. The petition was dismissed with costs due to the petitioner's failure to comply and wasting court time.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.