Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The Calcutta High Court reviewed the cancellation of the petitioner's registration due to alleged tax evasion. The court noted that the petitioner did not submit required documents but responded to a show cause notice. The rejection of the application for revocation was based on non-submission of purchase and sale statements. The court directed the cancellation to be revoked upon filing returns and documents as required. The orders of cancellation and rejection were set aside, contingent on the petitioner complying with tax obligations. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court reviewed the cancellation of the petitioner's registration due to alleged tax evasion. The court noted that the petitioner did not submit required documents but responded to a show cause notice. The rejection of the application for revocation was based on non-submission of purchase and sale statements. The court directed the cancellation to be revoked upon filing returns and documents as required. The orders of cancellation and rejection were set aside, contingent on the petitioner complying with tax obligations. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.