Agreement-date stamp valuation requires the same registered property, fixed consideration, and qualifying payment; an unrelated prior booking cannot a...
Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves a dispute regarding the waiver of Rural Development Cess (RDC) for Assessment Year 2002-03. The petitioner sought installment payment for Rs. 66,269 tax under AP GST Act, but the court stated it cannot order installment payment. Regarding RDC of Rs. 3,00,514, petitioner claimed exemption based on government orders, but respondent argued against it, stating petitioner already collected RDC from FCI. Court agreed with respondent, emphasizing that granting exemption would lead to undue enrichment. Petitioner's failure to challenge the claim led to dismissal of the writ petition.
The case involves a dispute regarding the waiver of Rural Development Cess (RDC) for Assessment Year 2002-03. The petitioner sought installment payment for Rs. 66,269 tax under AP GST Act, but the court stated it cannot order installment payment. Regarding RDC of Rs. 3,00,514, petitioner claimed exemption based on government orders, but respondent argued against it, stating petitioner already collected RDC from FCI. Court agreed with respondent, emphasizing that granting exemption would lead to undue enrichment. Petitioner's failure to challenge the claim led to dismissal of the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4883 
