Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a...
Validity of pre-show cause notices u/s 74 since not uploaded in the View notices and orders - Petition not maintainable due to availability of appeal remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.