Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a...
Validity of pre-show cause notices u/s 74 since not uploaded in the View notices and orders - Petition not maintainable due to availability of appeal remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the validity of pre-show cause notices issued under section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017. The notices were not uploaded in the designated "view notices and orders" section but in the "additional notices and orders" section of the portal. The court noted the petitioner's failure to disclose when they became aware of the notices' uploading. Emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy of appeal under section 107 of the Act, the court directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority. The court refrained from deciding on the adequacy of notice service and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
