Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
The Kerala High Court reviewed a case involving dishonor of a...
Dishonor of Cheque: Suspension of sentence. Sufficient reason for ordering a deposit of 20% of the amount of compensation, not assigned. Matter restored back
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Kerala High Court reviewed a case involving dishonor of a cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court examined the suspension of sentence under section 389 of the CrPC and found that the Sessions Judge did not provide sufficient reasoning for ordering a deposit of 20% of the compensation imposed by the Trial Court. The High Court set aside the order directing the petitioner to make the deposit and instructed the Sessions Court to reconsider the applications with a fresh hearing for both parties within one month.
The Kerala High Court reviewed a case involving dishonor of a cheque under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court examined the suspension of sentence under section 389 of the CrPC and found that the Sessions Judge did not provide sufficient reasoning for ordering a deposit of 20% of the compensation imposed by the Trial Court. The High Court set aside the order directing the petitioner to make the deposit and instructed the Sessions Court to reconsider the applications with a fresh hearing for both parties within one month.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
