Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court rejected an appellate order due to gross delay in filing, citing Section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 involving the issue of cancellation of registration. The Act allows appeals within three months, with a one-month extension for delay condonation with valid reasons. The Supreme Court's order on limitation during the pandemic was considered, setting a deadline for filing appeals. The court emphasized that Article 226 jurisdiction should not be used when alternate remedies are available and the party failed to act diligently within the prescribed time. The principle of favoring diligence over indolence was highlighted, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
The High Court rejected an appellate order due to gross delay in filing, citing Section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 involving the issue of cancellation of registration. The Act allows appeals within three months, with a one-month extension for delay condonation with valid reasons. The Supreme Court's order on limitation during the pandemic was considered, setting a deadline for filing appeals. The court emphasized that Article 226 jurisdiction should not be used when alternate remedies are available and the party failed to act diligently within the prescribed time. The principle of favoring diligence over indolence was highlighted, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
