Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Karnataka High Court determined tax and penalty in a case where the original tax invoice was not carried during goods transportation. The court relied on a previous decision involving Rule 138-A of the SGST, Section 68 of the CGST, and Rule 48 of the CGST. It was held that as per Rule 48(1)(b) of the CGST, the transporter is only required to carry the duplicate copy, not the original tax invoice. The court rejected the contention that the petitioner should pay tax and penalty for not carrying the original invoice. The petitioner's claim for refund of double tax paid was accepted, and the petition was allowed.
The Karnataka High Court determined tax and penalty in a case where the original tax invoice was not carried during goods transportation. The court relied on a previous decision involving Rule 138-A of the SGST, Section 68 of the CGST, and Rule 48 of the CGST. It was held that as per Rule 48(1)(b) of the CGST, the transporter is only required to carry the duplicate copy, not the original tax invoice. The court rejected the contention that the petitioner should pay tax and penalty for not carrying the original invoice. The petitioner's claim for refund of double tax paid was accepted, and the petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
