Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT Indore addressed various issues in the case. Firstly, it ruled that interest on outstanding GST is allowable as a business expenditure, not a penalty, and cannot be disallowed u/s 37(1). Secondly, interest on belated TDS deposit is not an allowable business deduction, akin to income tax liabilities, and was rightly disallowed. Thirdly, adhoc disallowance of traveling expenses by AO was unfounded as no personal element was proven, leading to deletion of the disallowance by CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.
The ITAT Indore addressed various issues in the case. Firstly, it ruled that interest on outstanding GST is allowable as a business expenditure, not a penalty, and cannot be disallowed u/s 37(1). Secondly, interest on belated TDS deposit is not an allowable business deduction, akin to income tax liabilities, and was rightly disallowed. Thirdly, adhoc disallowance of traveling expenses by AO was unfounded as no personal element was proven, leading to deletion of the disallowance by CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.