Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order demanding payment including penalty u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 due to the petitioner's lack of awareness and inability to respond to the proceedings, violating natural justice principles. The court found that the petitioner missed the notice uploaded in the "Additional Notices" tab on the portal. The impugned order was overturned, granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond to the Show Cause Notice and directing the respondent to reopen the portal for a response within four weeks. The petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
