Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being based on borrowed satisfaction without proper enquiry. The AO noted discrepancies in LTCG disclosure and re-assessed income u/s 147. However, the Tribunal found the AO's actions flawed, as the assessee had disclosed exempt income in Schedule-EI. The AO's lack of independent satisfaction led to quashing of the assessment, citing Meenakshi Overseas (P) Ltd. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Kolkata examined the validity of reassessment proceedings based on "reasons to believe" u/s 147. The AO's reasons lacked independent application of mind, being based on borrowed satisfaction without proper enquiry. The AO noted discrepancies in LTCG disclosure and re-assessed income u/s 147. However, the Tribunal found the AO's actions flawed, as the assessee had disclosed exempt income in Schedule-EI. The AO's lack of independent satisfaction led to quashing of the assessment, citing Meenakshi Overseas (P) Ltd. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
