Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as required u/s 75(4) of the Act of 2017. Section 75(4) mandates a hearing when a request is made in writing or an adverse decision is contemplated. The court set aside the order and directed respondent no.1 to reconsider the show cause notice and reply after providing the petitioners with a hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as required u/s 75(4) of the Act of 2017. Section 75(4) mandates a hearing when a request is made in writing or an adverse decision is contemplated. The court set aside the order and directed respondent no.1 to reconsider the show cause notice and reply after providing the petitioners with a hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
