Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
Section 54 construction relief survives pre-transfer commencement when completion occurs within the statutory period, excluding ineligible spouse-owne...
The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as required u/s 75(4) of the Act of 2017. Section 75(4) mandates a hearing when a request is made in writing or an adverse decision is contemplated. The court set aside the order and directed respondent no.1 to reconsider the show cause notice and reply after providing the petitioners with a hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as required u/s 75(4) of the Act of 2017. Section 75(4) mandates a hearing when a request is made in writing or an adverse decision is contemplated. The court set aside the order and directed respondent no.1 to reconsider the show cause notice and reply after providing the petitioners with a hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
