Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as required u/s 75(4) of the Act of 2017. Section 75(4) mandates a hearing when a request is made in writing or an adverse decision is contemplated. The court set aside the order and directed respondent no.1 to reconsider the show cause notice and reply after providing the petitioners with a hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Calcutta High Court found a violation of principles of natural justice as the impugned order was passed without giving the petitioners an opportunity of hearing as required u/s 75(4) of the Act of 2017. Section 75(4) mandates a hearing when a request is made in writing or an adverse decision is contemplated. The court set aside the order and directed respondent no.1 to reconsider the show cause notice and reply after providing the petitioners with a hearing. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
