Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash deposits was found to be reconciled, leading to allowance of the assessee's appeal. Regarding disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash purchases over Rs. 20,000, it was noted that no specific instances were provided by the AO, and the total cash purchases were deemed reasonable at 2.6% of turnover. As no contravention of Section 40A(3) was evidenced, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash deposits was found to be reconciled, leading to allowance of the assessee's appeal. Regarding disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash purchases over Rs. 20,000, it was noted that no specific instances were provided by the AO, and the total cash purchases were deemed reasonable at 2.6% of turnover. As no contravention of Section 40A(3) was evidenced, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
