Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash deposits was found to be reconciled, leading to allowance of the assessee's appeal. Regarding disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash purchases over Rs. 20,000, it was noted that no specific instances were provided by the AO, and the total cash purchases were deemed reasonable at 2.6% of turnover. As no contravention of Section 40A(3) was evidenced, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
The ITAT Delhi held that no addition u/s 68 was warranted as there was no abnormal jump in sales, with audited results and profits undisputed. The difference in cash deposits was found to be reconciled, leading to allowance of the assessee's appeal. Regarding disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash purchases over Rs. 20,000, it was noted that no specific instances were provided by the AO, and the total cash purchases were deemed reasonable at 2.6% of turnover. As no contravention of Section 40A(3) was evidenced, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
