Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by NCLT appointing an official liquidator for the appellant company. The official liquidator did not file an application for continuance of the appeal before the tribunal within five years of the NCLT order. As per Rule 22, the appeal stands abated.
The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by NCLT appointing an official liquidator for the appellant company. The official liquidator did not file an application for continuance of the appeal before the tribunal within five years of the NCLT order. As per Rule 22, the appeal stands abated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
