Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by NCLT appointing an official liquidator for the appellant company. The official liquidator did not file an application for continuance of the appeal before the tribunal within five years of the NCLT order. As per Rule 22, the appeal stands abated.
The CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the appeal abates u/s Rule 22 of Custom, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Procedure Rules, 1982 due to the liquidation order by NCLT appointing an official liquidator for the appellant company. The official liquidator did not file an application for continuance of the appeal before the tribunal within five years of the NCLT order. As per Rule 22, the appeal stands abated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
