Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
