Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
The Delhi High Court found a violation of natural justice principles in a case involving a cryptic order u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court held that the order failed to consider the petitioner's reply, which explained an error in tax credit details placement. The court set aside the order dated 05.12.2023, remitting the matter for a fresh speaking order by the proper officer. The petitioner will be granted a personal hearing. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4872 
