Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in re-filing a review petition. The reasons provided for the delay included counsel's indisposition and procedural formalities due to the Petitioner being a Government Department. The Court found the reason of verbatim copy inadequate but accepted counsel's ill health as a valid ground. The Court noted that the cash seized was not stock in trade for the taxpaying business of optical lenses. Ultimately, the Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petition, as there were no grounds to review the order dated 22.08.2023.
The Delhi High Court considered a case involving condonation of delay in re-filing a review petition. The reasons provided for the delay included counsel's indisposition and procedural formalities due to the Petitioner being a Government Department. The Court found the reason of verbatim copy inadequate but accepted counsel's ill health as a valid ground. The Court noted that the cash seized was not stock in trade for the taxpaying business of optical lenses. Ultimately, the Court allowed the application for condonation of delay in re-filing the review petition, as there were no grounds to review the order dated 22.08.2023.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
