Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Page of 4886
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97705 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition in light of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. It was held that the availability of an alternative remedy does not always bar a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court distinguished between "entertainability" and "maintainability" of a writ petition. The non-issuance of notices electronically on the portal was discussed, emphasizing the statutory modes of service under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court also addressed the non-uploading of certain forms, stating that compliance can be waived in certain situations. The issuance of notices and orders by different authorities was considered, with the court concluding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference in the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
The High Court considered the maintainability of a petition in light of the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. It was held that the availability of an alternative remedy does not always bar a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court distinguished between "entertainability" and "maintainability" of a writ petition. The non-issuance of notices electronically on the portal was discussed, emphasizing the statutory modes of service under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017. The court also addressed the non-uploading of certain forms, stating that compliance can be waived in certain situations. The issuance of notices and orders by different authorities was considered, with the court concluding that the petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference in the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.