Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that in a case involving undervaluation of timber imports, the burden of proof lies on the authorities to establish duty demand, penalty, and interest. Referring to the Beena Sales Corporation case, where similar evidence was relied upon, the Tribunal found the decision applicable and upheld by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable and set aside, with all appeals allowed and consequential relief granted.
CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that in a case involving undervaluation of timber imports, the burden of proof lies on the authorities to establish duty demand, penalty, and interest. Referring to the Beena Sales Corporation case, where similar evidence was relied upon, the Tribunal found the decision applicable and upheld by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the impugned orders were deemed unsustainable and set aside, with all appeals allowed and consequential relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.