Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Calcutta High Court reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the addition u/s 68 for a purportedly bogus claim of exemption of Long Term Capital Gain from the sale of shares of a penny stock. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) found the assessment to be prima facie erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, leading to the issuance of a show cause notice. The PCIT independently evaluated the assessment records, concluding that the assessing officer should have treated the credit as bogus and disallowed the exemption u/s 10(38). The High Court differentiated this case from a previous ruling involving Sinhotia Metals and Minerals Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing that the PCIT's decision was valid in this context. The Court overturned the Tribunal's decision, reinstating the PCIT's order u/s 263.
The Calcutta High Court reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the addition u/s 68 for a purportedly bogus claim of exemption of Long Term Capital Gain from the sale of shares of a penny stock. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) found the assessment to be prima facie erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, leading to the issuance of a show cause notice. The PCIT independently evaluated the assessment records, concluding that the assessing officer should have treated the credit as bogus and disallowed the exemption u/s 10(38). The High Court differentiated this case from a previous ruling involving Sinhotia Metals and Minerals Pvt. Ltd., emphasizing that the PCIT's decision was valid in this context. The Court overturned the Tribunal's decision, reinstating the PCIT's order u/s 263.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
