Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time u/s 107 of the RGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. Citing the Glaxo Smith Kline case, the court emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked if the statutory remedy of appeal is foreclosed by limitation. The petitioner deliberately did not file an appeal and approached the court after the order became final. As no valid explanation was provided for not availing the statutory appeal remedy, the court dismissed the writ petition following the Supreme Court's precedent.
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time u/s 107 of the RGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. Citing the Glaxo Smith Kline case, the court emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked if the statutory remedy of appeal is foreclosed by limitation. The petitioner deliberately did not file an appeal and approached the court after the order became final. As no valid explanation was provided for not availing the statutory appeal remedy, the court dismissed the writ petition following the Supreme Court's precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
