Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time u/s 107 of the RGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. Citing the Glaxo Smith Kline case, the court emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked if the statutory remedy of appeal is foreclosed by limitation. The petitioner deliberately did not file an appeal and approached the court after the order became final. As no valid explanation was provided for not availing the statutory appeal remedy, the court dismissed the writ petition following the Supreme Court's precedent.
The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed time u/s 107 of the RGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017. Citing the Glaxo Smith Kline case, the court emphasized that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked if the statutory remedy of appeal is foreclosed by limitation. The petitioner deliberately did not file an appeal and approached the court after the order became final. As no valid explanation was provided for not availing the statutory appeal remedy, the court dismissed the writ petition following the Supreme Court's precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
