Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95954 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's application for refund of excess ITC from 2010-11 to 2013-14 was rejected, directing them to apply from the relevant year. The court held that interest on the refund accrued from the date of the first application (27.11.2020) and should have been paid after sixty days. The subsequent assessment proceedings did not affect the petitioner's right to interest on the accrued amount. The court allowed the petition, directing payment of interest on the refunded amount.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's application for refund of excess ITC from 2010-11 to 2013-14 was rejected, directing them to apply from the relevant year. The court held that interest on the refund accrued from the date of the first application (27.11.2020) and should have been paid after sixty days. The subsequent assessment proceedings did not affect the petitioner's right to interest on the accrued amount. The court allowed the petition, directing payment of interest on the refunded amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
