Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's application for refund of excess ITC from 2010-11 to 2013-14 was rejected, directing them to apply from the relevant year. The court held that interest on the refund accrued from the date of the first application (27.11.2020) and should have been paid after sixty days. The subsequent assessment proceedings did not affect the petitioner's right to interest on the accrued amount. The court allowed the petition, directing payment of interest on the refunded amount.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court addressed the issue of refund of excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) and entitlement to interest on delayed refund. The petitioner's application for refund of excess ITC from 2010-11 to 2013-14 was rejected, directing them to apply from the relevant year. The court held that interest on the refund accrued from the date of the first application (27.11.2020) and should have been paid after sixty days. The subsequent assessment proceedings did not affect the petitioner's right to interest on the accrued amount. The court allowed the petition, directing payment of interest on the refunded amount.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
