Withdrawal of obsolete FEMA circulars streamlines rules on external commercial borrowings, non-resident bond investments, and money transfer sub-agent...
Departmental appeal limitation after call-book recall preserves original filing, while documented correlation supports SAD refund on imported granules...
The Delhi High Court considered the winding up of an unregistered foreign company for non-payment of outstanding dues u/s 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company's inability to pay its debts justified winding up proceedings u/s 583 of the Act. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rajah of Vizianagram case and Action Ispat case, supporting the transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT if at a nascent stage. Consequently, the court transferred the present winding up proceedings to the NCLT, disposing of the petition.
The Delhi High Court considered the winding up of an unregistered foreign company for non-payment of outstanding dues u/s 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company's inability to pay its debts justified winding up proceedings u/s 583 of the Act. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rajah of Vizianagram case and Action Ispat case, supporting the transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT if at a nascent stage. Consequently, the court transferred the present winding up proceedings to the NCLT, disposing of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
