Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The Delhi High Court considered the winding up of an unregistered foreign company for non-payment of outstanding dues u/s 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company's inability to pay its debts justified winding up proceedings u/s 583 of the Act. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rajah of Vizianagram case and Action Ispat case, supporting the transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT if at a nascent stage. Consequently, the court transferred the present winding up proceedings to the NCLT, disposing of the petition.
The Delhi High Court considered the winding up of an unregistered foreign company for non-payment of outstanding dues u/s 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company's inability to pay its debts justified winding up proceedings u/s 583 of the Act. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rajah of Vizianagram case and Action Ispat case, supporting the transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT if at a nascent stage. Consequently, the court transferred the present winding up proceedings to the NCLT, disposing of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4789
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
