COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
The Delhi High Court considered the winding up of an unregistered foreign company for non-payment of outstanding dues u/s 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company's inability to pay its debts justified winding up proceedings u/s 583 of the Act. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rajah of Vizianagram case and Action Ispat case, supporting the transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT if at a nascent stage. Consequently, the court transferred the present winding up proceedings to the NCLT, disposing of the petition.
The Delhi High Court considered the winding up of an unregistered foreign company for non-payment of outstanding dues u/s 433(e) and (f) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found that the company's inability to pay its debts justified winding up proceedings u/s 583 of the Act. The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Rajah of Vizianagram case and Action Ispat case, supporting the transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT if at a nascent stage. Consequently, the court transferred the present winding up proceedings to the NCLT, disposing of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
