Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not specifically request summons for cross-examination during the assessment proceedings. While acknowledging the importance of natural justice, the Court held that the petitioner's failure to make a specific prayer for cross-examination before the assessing officer precluded the writ petition's consideration on those grounds. The Court highlighted the alternative remedy of appeal and directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within 15 days, with the option to request cross-examination of Third Party.
Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not specifically request summons for cross-examination during the assessment proceedings. While acknowledging the importance of natural justice, the Court held that the petitioner's failure to make a specific prayer for cross-examination before the assessing officer precluded the writ petition's consideration on those grounds. The Court highlighted the alternative remedy of appeal and directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority within 15 days, with the option to request cross-examination of Third Party.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
