Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue characterization - Taxability of IUC [Interconnect utility charges] as Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - DTAA between India and Hongkong - The Tribunal noted that there is no treaty between India and Hong Kong, the country of which the assessee is a tax resident. The Tribunal held that the payments received by the assessee cannot be held to be royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. The revenue did not establish a permanent establishment of the assessee in India to tax the receipt in India. The payments received by the assessee are considered business profits taxable in the recipient country.
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India - revenue characterization - Taxability of IUC [Interconnect utility charges] as Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) - DTAA between India and Hongkong - The Tribunal noted that there is no treaty between India and Hong Kong, the country of which the assessee is a tax resident. The Tribunal held that the payments received by the assessee cannot be held to be royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act. The revenue did not establish a permanent establishment of the assessee in India to tax the receipt in India. The payments received by the assessee are considered business profits taxable in the recipient country.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
